O emprego do poder militar contra o terrorismo: uma análise comparativa entre as Operações Neptune Spear (2011) e Nimrod (1980) à luz da Superioridade Relativa

Abstract

This academic work addresses the use of military power against terrorism, conducting a comparative analysis between two special operations: Operation Neptune Spear (2011) and Operation Nimrod (1980). The study explores McRaven's concept of Relative Superiority, which asserts that military forces, even with small numbers but highly trained, can gain a decisive advantage over enemies in well-fortified positions through surprise, rigorous preparation, and efficient execution. Operation Neptune Spear resulted in the capture and death of Osama bin Laden, leader of Al Qaeda, while Operation Nimrod aimed to resolve the siege of the Iranian embassy in London, rescuing hostages and neutralizing the captors. Both operations highlight the importance of intelligence, advanced technology, and interagency cooperation for the success of military interventions against terrorism. The comparative analysis reveals similarities and singularities that offer valuable lessons for future military operations, emphasizing the need for meticulous planning, operational security, exhaustive training, and the ability to quickly adapt to the frictions of war. These elements are essential to address the terrorist threat in modern times, where globalization and technological advances amplify the reach and impact of terrorist acts