Guerra das Malvinas: o conjugado anfíbio britânico a luz da Doutrina Militar Naval da Marinha do Brasil

Abstract

The Falklands War was one of the largest battles that highlighted the territorial sovereignty dispute between Argentina and the United Kingdom, as well as the strategic relevance of naval power. The objective of this study was to analyze the employment of the British amphibious task force and its adherence to Naval Military Doctrine (NMD) during the war. The analysis of the theoretical foundations of classical thinkers such as Mahan, Corbett, and Geoffrey Till in the context of the Falklands conflict demonstrated the applicability of their ideas and their continued relevance to contemporary maritime security. Additionally, the principles of NMD supported the analysis of British Naval Power in the war and how theoretical principles were fundamental to the successful execution of the military operation. The integration of naval, air-naval, and marine corps assets enabled coordinated and efficient operations, ensuring the United Kingdom's victory. This analysis underscores the importance of the British Amphibious Task Force as a key element in power projection and in executing operations to retake the Falkland Islands, demonstrating its adherence to NMD. In conclusion, the theories of these strategists provided a solid foundation for understanding the importance of maritime power in protecting national interests, projecting power, and controlling commercial routes. The practical application of these theories in the Falklands War not only validates their premises but also offers valuable lessons for contemporary naval military doctrine, including for the Brazilian Navy.