Ações de defesa aeroespacial na Batalha de Midway (1942): Aderência da Tomada de Decisões das Forças Americanas ao Ciclo OODA

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to investigate the adherence of the decision-making process of the U.S. naval forces' command during the Battle of Midway, particularly in relation to the aerospace defense actions developed, to the principles of John Boyd’s theory. To achieve this objective, the Theory vs. Reality methodology was employed, supported by an extensive bibliographical review. The research began with an examination of John Boyd's theoretical framework, focusing on its origins and the concepts of the OODA Loop. The study detailed how Boyd developed this theory, based on principles of Thermodynamics and Game Theory, to better understand ande enhance decision-making in complex and dynamic environments. The researchn highlighted the essential role of aircraft carriers and planes in the Battle of Midway, the tactics employed, critical decisions made by commanders, and the consequences of these actions in the course and outcome of the conflict. The study examined theo alignment of Midway's reality with the OODA Loop, assessing how the principles of Observation, Orientation, Decision, and Action were implemented during the battle. The research concluded that, despite the OODA Loop being developed years after the Battle of Midway, the decision-making process of U.S. forces, which culminated in aerospace defense actions, aligns with Boyd’s theory. This finding significantly underscores the importance of adaptability and speed in conducting aerospace defense actions for naval forces.